## Code Review - FAIL ### Critical Scope Mismatch The PR implements **WCAG 2.1 AA Accessibility** improvements, but the ticket requires **"Polish and Theme Configuration with daisyUI"**. ### What Was Implemented (PR #44) - Accessibility styles for WCAG compliance - ARIA labels, roles, and landmarks - Skip-to-content links, focus indicators - Screen reader support (.sr-only) - Reduced motion support - High contrast mode support ### What Ticket #89 Requires 1. **Final Theme Polish** - Review all pages for consistent daisyUI component usage 2. **Component Consistency** - Ensure buttons use btn, forms use input/select/textarea, badges use badge, cards use card 3. **Transitions and Animations** - Use daisyUI transition classes, btn-loading, progress for loading states 4. **Responsive Testing** - Test daisyUI components on mobile 5. **Cross-Browser Testing** - Verify daisyUI works across browsers 6. **Documentation** - Document chosen daisyUI theme, custom configuration, style guide ### Acceptance Criteria Check | Criterion | Status | |-----------|--------| | Consistent daisyUI styling across all pages | ❌ Not addressed | | Working theme switching (light/dark) | ❌ Not addressed | | Smooth transitions using daisyUI classes | ❌ Not addressed | | Theme customization documentation | ❌ Not addressed | | WCAG accessibility | ✅ Implemented (but not in ticket requirements) | ### Recommendation The accessibility work is valuable but belongs in a **separate ticket** (perhaps "Step 10: WCAG Accessibility Compliance"). This ticket should implement the theme polish and daisyUI configuration as specified. ### Required Fix Either: 1. **Option A**: Update this PR to implement theme polish/configuration as specified (close PR #44, create new PR for the actual requirements) 2. **Option B**: Update ticket #89 requirements to reflect the accessibility work that was actually implemented Given this is "Step 9 of UI Modernization" and accessibility was not mentioned in any previous steps, **Option A** is the correct approach.