## Code Review ### Spec Pattern Search (REQUIRED) - Searched for existing spec patterns: `find spec -name "*spec.rb" | sort` - Found existing ticket-related spec files: - `spec/features/ticket_workflow_spec.rb` - tests viewing tickets on Kanban - `spec/features/ticket_comments_spec.rb` - tests comment form on ticket page - `spec/models/ticket_spec.rb` - model tests - `spec/requests/api/v1/tickets_spec.rb` - API endpoint tests - `spec/controllers/api/v1/tickets_controller_spec.rb` - API controller tests - `spec/factories/tickets.rb` - test factories - Similar patterns found: Feature specs exist for UI interactions on ticket pages (e.g., `ticket_comments_spec.rb` for form submission on ticket page) ### Test Results - Test suite run: `bundle exec rspec` - Results: 700 examples, 2 failures, 7 pending - **Note:** The 2 failures are in `spec/features/dashboard_spec.rb` and are pre-existing issues unrelated to this PR: - "Dashboard" text not visible issue - "Kanban" link not visible issue ### Spec Coverage Check - Files changed: - `app/controllers/tickets_controller.rb` - added `edit` and `update` actions (45 lines) - `app/views/tickets/edit.html.haml` - new edit form view (91 lines) - `app/views/tickets/show.html.haml` - added Edit button (1 line) - `config/routes.rb` - added edit/update routes (1 line) - Required specs found: NONE for the new edit/update functionality - Missing specs: - `spec/features/ticket_edit_spec.rb` - MISSING (pattern exists: `ticket_comments_spec.rb` tests forms on ticket page) - Tests for the edit form submission workflow - Tests for the update action with valid data - Tests for the update action with invalid data (validation errors) - Tests for JSON parsing error handling in working_memory - Tests for dependencies parsing (comma-separated to array) ### Code Quality Review **Observations:** 1. `ticket_params` uses `.tap` to manually parse `dependencies` and `working_memory` - this bypasses strong parameters standard pattern 2. JSON parsing for `working_memory` has error handling, but the error is added to `@ticket.errors` AFTER the validation check - this could result in a 200 OK with errors displayed, not a 422 3. The `before_action :set_ticket` only applies to `show`, `edit`, `update` - `new` and `create` are not defined (which is fine) 4. No authorization checks visible - anyone can edit any ticket (may be intentional for this project) 5. Edit button uses `btn-outline` style - consistent with daisyUI patterns **Security:** - No obvious SQL injection risks (dependencies parsed via `to_i`) - No XSS risks (Rails helpers handle escaping) - No authorization - anyone can edit any ticket (if this is a concern) **Implementation:** - Matches ticket requirements: title, description, priority, PR URL, dependencies, working memory all editable - UI follows existing daisyUI patterns from the codebase ### Decision **FAIL - Missing Tests** This PR adds significant new functionality (edit form with complex JSON parsing, dependencies parsing, error handling) but includes no tests for: 1. The edit form rendering and submission 2. Valid update scenarios 3. Invalid JSON handling for working_memory 4. Validation error display 5. Dependencies parsing from comma-separated input Action Required: Add feature specs for the ticket edit/update workflow, following the pattern in `spec/features/ticket_comments_spec.rb`. Tests should cover: - Visiting the edit page - Submitting valid updates - Displaying validation errors - JSON parsing errors in working_memory field - Successful redirect after update