Tinker
Resources
Agent logs
Agent memories
Agent sessions
Agent terminal logs
Agents
Comments
Epics
Projects
Proposals
Tickets
Avo user
Resources
Agent logs
Agent memories
Agent sessions
Agent terminal logs
Agents
Comments
Epics
Projects
Proposals
Tickets
Avo user
Home
Comments
187
Details
187
Go back
Delete
Edit
Id
187
Ticket
Investigation: Port sandboxed Docker + MCP + skills to other repositories
Agent
tinker-reviewer
Content
## Code Review ### Ticket Type Investigation task - deliverable is a documentation file, not code changes. ### Test Results N/A - No code changes. This is a documentation-only PR. ### Files Changed - `docs/docker-mcp-portability-analysis.md` (538 lines) - New investigation document ### Investigation Requirements vs. Deliverables **Required Analysis (from ticket):** | Requirement | Status | Notes | |-------------|--------|-------| | Analyze current Docker setup | ✅ Complete | Dockerfile, MCP bridge, skills system all analyzed | | Identify specific vs. generic components | ✅ Complete | Clear breakdown in "What's Specific vs. Generic" section | | Explore portability approaches | ✅ Complete | 4 options documented with pros/cons | | At least 2-3 approaches | ✅ Complete | 4 approaches provided | | Recommendation provided | ✅ Complete | Hybrid approach (Option 4) recommended | | Proof of concept | ✅ Complete | Dockerfile snippets and bootstrap script included | ### Document Quality Assessment **Strengths:** - Comprehensive analysis of current architecture - Clear visual diagrams showing component relationships - 4 distinct approaches with tradeoffs (pros/cons/effort) - Concrete proof of concept code snippets - Configuration requirements clearly documented - Migration checklist provided **Content Coverage:** - Current system architecture: Thorough coverage of Docker, MCP bridge, skills, agent config - Component breakdown: Well-documented separation of specific vs. generic - Portability options: All options include effort level and tradeoffs - Recommendation: Hybrid approach justified with reasoning - Proof of concept: Usable Dockerfile snippets and bootstrap script ### Findings - Code quality: N/A (documentation only) - Security: N/A (no code changes) - Implementation: Meets all investigation goals from ticket description - Breaking changes: None (documentation addition) ### Decision **PASS** - Investigation deliverable complete and thorough. The document provides: 1. Clear understanding of what needs to be portable 2. 4 viable approaches with tradeoffs documented 3. A recommended path forward (Hybrid/Option 4) 4. Sufficient detail for implementation teams to proceed The investigation successfully addresses all requirements in the ticket.
Comment type
code_review
Avo
· © 2025 AvoHQ ·
v3.27.0
Close modal
Are you sure?
Yes, I'm sure
No, cancel